One Gear Is Enough

One gear is not enough for everything. Worth getting that out of the way before the evangelism starts.

Gears work. They're useful. They let you climb a steep hill without making the noises normally associated with moving furniture, and they let tired legs bail out when the trail points somewhere your cadence didn't agree to. Modern drivetrains are genuinely good now. They shift under load, they've got enormous range, and mostly they do their job with less drama than the person operating them.

So no, a single speed isn't secretly more efficient, and it isn't the right tool for every trail or every mood. Pulling most of the gears off a bike doesn't uncover some engineering truth that Shimano and SRAM missed. I own geared bikes. I ride them. This isn't a conversion pamphlet.

And one gear is still usually enough. Not enough to optimize everything. Enough to get the whole ride. That gap is the thing this entire site is built around.

The bike stops arguing with you

A geared bike is always holding out options. Shift down before the climb, shift up out of the corner, find a better cadence, don't cross-chain, and figure out whether that clicking is the index, grit in the cassette, or another expensive part letting you know it exists. None of it is hard, and after enough years most of it happens without you thinking about it. But it's a conversation, and the bike never really shuts up.

A single speed ends the conversation before it starts. You picked the gear days ago, probably after a few purchases you'd rather not itemize. Once you're on the trail there's nothing to decide. You pedal. When that stops working you stand up. When that stops working you shove harder on the pedals, and when that stops working you walk. Then you get back on.

That's not sophisticated. That's the appeal. Brad Holtz calls it mechanical simplicity and mental simplicity: grab the bike, pedal, that's the whole thing. Anybody can photograph the missing derailleur. The missing category of thought is the part that actually matters, and it doesn't show up in pictures.

Quiet

Mountain biking has filled up with information. Before you even leave the house you can check maps, elevation profiles, trail conditions, weather models, tire-pressure charts, and gear-ratio tables. On the ride you can log distance, speed, heart rate, power, cadence, temperature, and whether a watch on your wrist thinks the morning was productive.

Most of that is useful. I'm in no position to complain, because I just spent an entire evening bolting GPX maps and elevation profiles onto this website. I clearly build systems for handing out more of the stuff, not less.

But sometimes you want the bike to go quiet, and one gear takes a whole category of decision off the table. There's no perfect gear to go looking for. There's the one you brought. The trail gets your full attention because the drivetrain finally stopped asking questions.

None of this makes you enlightened. A cassette with fewer parts is not a personality. You just ride, and some days that turns out to be the part that was missing.

The trail changes without moving a rock

Same trail, different bike, and suddenly it's a different trail.

Climbs stop being about holding a nice cadence and start being about not losing momentum, so a little rise a geared bike would ignore becomes a problem you have to solve. You carry speed into it, pick a clean line, stand at the right second, and try not to waste anything. Corners cost more, because once the speed is gone there's no button to buy it back.

Technical climbs turn into a fight between traction, body position, and whatever ratio looked reasonable in the garage. You can't click into something easier and keep spinning. Sometimes you sprint at the thing, sometimes you pick your way up it, and sometimes you find out the gear was chosen on optimism.

This is why a loop you've ridden a hundred times can get interesting again. The three-mile loop behind my house hasn't changed in years. What changed is how many ways I'm allowed to respond to it, and it turns out fewer options is more fun than it sounds.

Walking

A single speed will make you walk eventually. That's not the concept failing. It's the concept working as designed.

There's going to be a climb that's too steep, too loose, or just badly timed. A ledge that stops the back wheel dead. A day the ratio is wrong because your legs are cooked, or because breakfast was chosen for taste. So you get off and push.

The first few times it feels like losing. Mountain bikers are trained to care about cleaning climbs, to remember the exact rock garden they finally rode without dabbing. A single speed makes walking normal. The Ten Laws say it better than I can: walking isn't failure, it's an alternate drivetrain mode. You push for thirty yards, nobody dies, and you get back on. It makes failure small, which is honestly one of the healthier things a bike has ever done for me.

Simple, not pure

Single-speed culture will drift into purity tests if you let it. Rigid is more authentic. Steel is more authentic. Flat pedals are more authentic. Anything invented after some date the speaker picked is softening the experience. It gets old fast, and it's beside the point.

One gear isn't one bike. My first was an On-One Inbred I put together cheap and then kept changing while I figured out what I wanted. The Krampus came later, all momentum and big wheels, and the Karate Monkey shares its drivetrain and still somehow rides like a different animal. Same rule, three bikes that have almost nothing else in common.

A single speed can have great brakes, modern tires, a dropper, and a fork that keeps your hands from filing a formal complaint. None of that cancels out the missing shifter. The idea was never to strip the bike down until it's morally acceptable. It was to keep the one part that matters and quit fussing over the rest. I've already made this exact argument about flat pedals, so I won't do it twice. Simplicity helps. Purity is mostly a way to wear other people out.

The people get the joke

The people around single speeding matter as much as the bikes, and Single Speed USA makes that obvious. Real riding, real climbs, plenty of people who can pedal circles around me. Also costumes, handups, beer, haircuts administered at the summit with clippers somebody carried up, and aid stations that would give an event insurer a stroke. Hard riding wrapped in an event that flatly refuses to take itself seriously. That's the whole trick, and it isn't an accident.

Cycling gets solemn if you're not careful. The gear becomes status, the training becomes your personality, every ride becomes content. A single-speed event leaves room to try hard without any of the reverence. You can care about the bike without pretending it makes you important, suffer up the climb, and then descend with people whose finishing times you'll never ask about. Fixie Dave has spent decades seeing the world from a bike that won't even let him coast, cheerfully off to the side of whatever everyone else is doing this year. One gear is just the cover charge. The people are why anybody comes back.

It's not a toughness thing

Single speeders aren't tougher than everyone else. Some are freakishly fit, some are technically brilliant, and plenty are ordinary riders with bad judgment and a free Saturday. The gear doesn't hand you character. You can absolutely ride one gear while staring at a GPS and narrating your hub's engagement points to a stranger.

The point is directness, not suffering. The hill's there, the gear's there, your legs are whatever they are today, and there's no easier option hiding behind a lever. That can feel clean, but it turns insufferable the second you start performing it. Nobody gets bonus points for choosing a ratio that makes the whole ride a slow-motion emergency. The best gear isn't the hardest one. It's the one that keeps the ride interesting, and no calculator is going to find it for you. That's still terrain and fitness and stubbornness.

Enough, until it isn't

I'll say it one more time, because it's the honest version: I own geared bikes. Some rides are just better with gears. Long days in the mountains, ground you've never seen, a loaded bikepacking rig, anything where getting home with working knees is the actual goal. Some mornings I want the options. Plenty of mornings I don't.

You don't have to pretend every other drivetrain is pointless. One gear just proves a complete ride doesn't need every feature on the menu. It's enough for the climb even when you walk part of it. Enough for the descent even when you spin out on the road home. Enough for a three-mile loop after work, and enough for a day that hurts. Not because it does everything. Because it leaves the parts that matter alone.

The trail is still hard. The descent is still fun. You still come home filthy and already planning the next one.

A modern bike gives you more range, more speed, more comfort, more choices. A single speed gives you fewer places to hide. Some days that's exactly what you're after, and it's most of what ends up documented here, one story at a time.

One gear is enough.

• culture
• single-speed